- Home
- What Is Partnership?
- Unit-Based Teams
- Your Role
- Regions
- Stories and Videos
- Tools
- eStore
Click a term to initiate a search.
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 6, 2011 :: By Cassandra Braun
Fatmata Kula Jah, phlebotomist
Department: San Francisco Outpatient Lab
Value Compass: Quality
Problem: Needles used to draw blood presented needle-stick risks to employees and caused severe bruising to patients
Metric: Patient complaints and staff near-miss injuries
Labor co-lead: Fatmata Kula Jah, phlebotomist
Management co-lead: Diane Chandler, manager
Small test of change: Piloted use of a different brand of needle
Result: Patient complaints of bruising dropped 70 percent and complaints from staff about near-miss needle sticks also decreased.
Biggest challenge: Getting everyone’s input and convincing people of change.
“Some people wanted to stick with one thing, but once they started using the new product they saw how it worked better,” says phlebotomist Melissa Paredes, workplace safety committee co-lead.
Document everything, particularly to help you determine whether you’re making a difference, says the team’s sponsor, Assistant Lab Director Maureen Fitzgibbons.
Agree that it’s a problem before tackling a project, according to union co-lead Fatmata Kula Jah. “Then we can work as a team to decide on a resolution,” she says.
Repetitive motion injuries are down, and many on the team say the project also illustrated partnership at its best.
“I would say (the partnership) worked well because it wasn’t something that was determined by one person,” explains Kula Jah. “It was a partnership with labor identifying the issue and bringing it to attention of management and having management join with labor to find a solution.”
In 2008, the San Francisco Medical Center Outpatient Lab began using Becton, Dickinson Co. (BD) needles for drawing blood as part of a supply contract with the company. After the switch, staff began noticing that patients complained more frequently about pain and bruising on their forearms. The department began a log of complaints.
Patients thought the longer BD needles looked like “harpoons,” says manager Diane Chandler.
Furthermore, staff found the BD needles difficult and more dangerous to use. The safety cap, which covers the needle, was flimsy and broke off easily, exposing staff to used needles, team members said.
“We had a BD representative come out and do in-service training on how to use their product because it was a product all Kaiser facilities were supposed to use,” Chandler says. “But it kept coming back—the bruises, the hematomas, the complaints. We would get five to six complaints every week. Now I get one (complaint) every two to three weeks.”
Concerned with the safety risk posed to employees and patients, the team filed a Responsible Reporting Form, which allows risk assessment leaders to track potential hazards in the workplace. The unit-based team decided to take it on as a project and worked to find a safer needle.
Phlebotomist Juana Harper, who has served on the National Sharps Safety Committee, was one of the UBT members who researched alternative needles. After trying several different needles, staff and patients consistently preferred those manufactured by Smith.