After a false start, the diagnostic imaging department at Woodland Hills Medical Center has found its stride. Its results are impressive: By drawing on the wide experience of the team, it’s improving workflow and boosting attendance.

To get those results, the department created one large UBT with several subcommittees and involved a physician champion. Two radiology summits, which were held to set priorities, included the whole team: 

• More than 160 employees and physicians who see a quarter-million patients a year.
• Staff in eight far-flung clinics as well as throughout the medical center. They range in age from late teens to 40-year veterans of Kaiser Permanente.
• Team members in eight areas of expertise, including ultrasound, MRI, CAT scan, nuclear medicine, mammography, general x-ray, and special procedures.  

From confusion to clarity

At first, the team’s diverse skills and experience flummoxed the department-based team (the term Woodland Hills uses instead of unit-based team).  

“We didn’t know the scope of our work,” says Selena Marchand, a lead sonographer and labor co-lead. “The old DBT got stalled talking about things like the doctors’ parking lot.”

A secret society?

In addition, says Marchand, the representative group—which was working without a facilitator—didn’t communicate with its co-workers about the DBT’s projects. “They thought we were some sort of secret society,” says Marchand, a member of SEIU UHW. 

The team restructured in October 2009, electing one delegate from each “modality,” as the areas of expertise are known, to the representative group.

“Pushing responsibility and accountability back to different modalities has been one of our successes,” says Mike Bruse, the department administrator and management co-lead. “We’re focused on things that we can control in our department.”

Summits get everyone involved

The co-leads convened two department-wide summits to focus on improving team performance and set priorities. Staff members brainstormed about what the challenging issues facing the department were and wrote them on flip chart pages on the wall. Then, each employee attached a sticky note to the issues that most concerned them. The team and managers set out to tackle the seven issues that received the most tags. As the work got under way, progress reports were posted in the employee break room to keep everyone on the team—not just the representatives—informed.

Better workflow

The department also improved the way it distributes film to radiologists, so that patients’ results get to primary care physicians faster. Before the change, technicians were forced to constantly interrupt doctors to read films. Now, there is a tally sheet on each radiologist’s door indicating how many films he or she is reading. This allows techs to know who is available to read a film—and allows radiologists to work undisturbed. An aide to the technologists tracks the process, acting as a traffic controller.

“It was a relatively simple thing that improved satisfaction and patient care a lot,” says Mark Schwartz, MD, who represents physicians on the UBT. “And it didn’t cost any money.”

Better attendance

The team also improved attendance, decreasing last-minute sick calls by 14 days from the end of 2009 to October 2010. They beat the Lab Department in a friendly competition two quarters in a row and were rewarded with a barbeque. To do this, team members simplified presentation of attendance data and posted up-to-the-minute metrics.  

Beyond these gains, management co-lead Bruse says the most significant change is employees’ confidence in their own ability to make improvements.

“Our meetings used to be ‘complain to Mike,’ ” he said. “These days, when people see a problem, they take steps to solve it themselves.”

I am one of the chairs the LMP leadership team, along with a union colleague from UFCW and two management leaders. I’m also the co-lead of the Woodland Hills’ union coalition. In addition, I’m a full-time certified registered nurse anesthetist in the operating room. To be an effective labor co-lead takes three things: time, collaboration and planning.

Time

I have been doing partnership work at Woodland Hills for 10 years. People respect the time I’ve invested. You have to be on fire for this because it’s an enormous responsibility. It’s going to cost you time, angst and effort. And you can’t build relationships passing in the hall. You have to make the investment of face time. That means showing up at the LMP council meetings, monthly, from 8:00 a.m. to noon.

Planning Ahead

It is important to bring in and plan for new blood. At Woodland Hills, we rotate the labor co-chair in our leadership team every two years. I believe this allows everyone to have a say. It builds trust and experience. And it ensures buy-in from each union—and each segment of each union. We build-in mentorship. For three months, the new person sits in and the current co-lead shows that person the ropes.

We also did this in the Kaiser Permanente Nurse Anesthetist Association when I was president in 2006. I would go with new facility reps to meetings. 

Collaboration

We really foster union efforts at the medical center level. We’ve got a group of long-term union coalition people and our unions speak with a single, powerful voice. There have been issues between unions, and we had to work things out until cooler heads prevailed. People say ‘I’m sorry’ and move on.

Working with management is both easy and difficult. It’s easy because they are so partnership oriented and respectful of the unions, and they welcome input. They lead by influence—not by authority by virtue of where they are on the food chain—just like we do. It is difficult sometimes because it requires us to work hard as partners. Sometimes it would be easier to just go along with their recommendations, but then we wouldn’t really be doing our jobs as union leaders. At certain points, you have to say, ‘Well, let me think about that,’ and ask your constituents what they think.

Hospitals are traditionally very hierarchical. The partnership is such an opportunity to have a voice.

What happens when teams truly walk a mile in their patients’ shoes? They often discover their own actions are making that mile a rocky one for patients—and as a result make huge breakthroughs in the way they deliver care.

In the case of South San Francisco’s multidepartmental pre-admission team, observing their processes from the other side of the gurney spurred them to dramatically streamline the pre-surgery and admitting process for patients. With the member at the forefront of their thinking, the team members turned a two-inch-thick packet of confusing, redundant information into a streamlined, one-page checklist. And a funny thing happened—while redesigning the process to help patients, the team improved the way it works.

“Patients would often get confused and weren’t sure what the next step in the process was,” says Brian Tzeng, MD, the Peri-operative Medicine director. “We realized we didn’t have a clear path for the patient to follow.”

Other teams throughout Kaiser Permanente are making similar realizations, framing their performance improvement work by asking the question, “What’s best for the patient?” If a possible solution doesn’t work well for the member and patient, then there’s more brainstorming to be done. These teams are taking the Value Compass to heart—organizing their work not just around the four points but examining what they’re doing from the patient’s perspective.

What does that mean for frontline teams? At the San Diego Medical Center, the Emergency Department sees up to 300 patients every 24 hours. Physicians and staff members are always on the go, delivering on the ultimate bottom line—saved lives. What could be more important? Clinical quality is high; patients are seen in a timely manner and the rate of unscheduled return visits is good.

Yet the results of a recent patient satisfaction survey bothered the team. The department scored well overall, but their patients gave it only 63 percent approval on one question: While you were in the Emergency Department, were you kept informed about how long the treatment would take?